Ny times the dubious science of online dating

31 Mar

It’s also clear from the website that this is a single-issue group, focused entirely on eliminating or reducing phthalates in our foods. Even if the health concerns are overblown, phthalates aren’t for you, so from a risk/benefit analysis, removing them from food seems like a swell idea.

However, this groups’ tactics are only adding to the confusion around a complicated issue.

Despite what many sources reported, the risk is almost certainly very low.

Phthalates are definitely toxic in rats, where they act as endocrine disruptors.

Before we get to that, let’s start with a discussion of risk.

Is there any risk to children (or those poor college students) from the phthalates found in these products?

), because it tells us a lot about how scientific information is communicated in our modern media landscape.

In the weeks that followed, the story spread across the internet and was reported by numerous news outlets and blogs.

That such a story would be so widely reported is not surprising – mac & cheese is a very common food for kids these days (as well as poor college students) and no one wants to hear they are poisoning their children.

There are some reports of phthalate toxicities outside of early reproductive and neurologic development, but there is even less evidence of real risk in these cases.

Then there is the dose of phthalates in the mac & cheese: the highest level detected was 218 parts per billion (ppb). Well, consider this: While it is uncertain if the phthalates in mac and cheese could cause any adverse health effects at all, it is much more likely that the high fat, processed sugars, and salt in these products will, since they are , which in turn is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and some types of cancer.